Trade Idea: Will DOGE audit the IRS before May?
Market: Will DOGE audit the IRS before May?
Trade: No
Current Odds: 55%
Return: 82%
Resolved by: End of April (1 month)
Position Size: Medium
Hey all and welcome back to a new trade idea on The Poly. Today we are looking at DOGE auditing the IRS. Doge's IRS review has set off alarm bells in Washington. The team is digging into the tax agency's inner workings, raising eyebrows about possible budget slashing and who gets to see Americans' private financial information. Doge is pushing for access to the IRS's most sensitive data systems, including their master database – the Integrated Data Retrieval System. They're also combing through contracts and day-to-day operations, all in the name of trimming the fat and boosting efficiency.
Immediately after taking office, the DOGE team began scrutinizing federal agencies, starting with USAID and now moving on to the IRS. But their approach has sparked serious questions about whether these reviews qualify as legitimate audits. Critics point out that DOGE's examinations don't follow standard auditing playbooks. Professional audits require methodical planning, risk evaluation, evidence collection, testing, and formal reporting, which are all seemingly absent from DOGE's process. Instead, their reviews come across as disorganized and lacking the technical expertise needed for proper government oversight, raising doubts about both their methods and findings.
As you may have seen from previous trades on Polymarket, semantics matter a lot when it comes to resolutions. Polymarket will not view DOGE’s reviews as an official audit, especially if the team is denied access to important systems like the IDRS. Moreover, there are some large Polymarket whales on the side of no, which comes in handy when a market's rules are relatively vague, for example, that of the Fort Knox gold market. Nonetheless, I urge caution if you are planning to trade this, as Polymarket has been known to make some strange decisions when resolving markets.
Lack of Qualified Auditing Personnel
Critics argue DOGE's IRS review lacks credibility simply because the team doesn't include qualified auditors. Career federal auditors have bluntly stated that "comparing real auditing to what DOGE is doing, there's no comparison" and that "none of them are auditors." This expertise gap undercuts the legitimacy of their entire operation. The people DOGE sent to examine the IRS appear to be tech specialists and software engineers rather than professionals trained in audit standards and procedures. Case in point: DOGE member Gavin Kliger, who visited IRS offices, is a software engineer with no credentials in auditing or accounting. Without proper qualifications, many question whether DOGE can deliver reliable findings about an agency as complex as the IRS.
Absence of Systematic Auditing Methodology
Musk’s DOGE team at the IRS has tossed the auditing rulebook out the window, raising red flags about their methods. Real audits follow clear steps: planning, risk assessment, evidence collection, testing, and reporting. DOGE has ignored these basics. Their planning problems are obvious. Instead of carefully defining what they're examining, DOGE makes "hasty or capricious decisions" without proper preparation. Critics note they act without "public fact-finding" before jumping to conclusions. Professional auditors prioritize high-risk areas. Richard Chambers, an auditing expert, points out that DOGE should "follow the risks" but hasn't shown any systematic approach to their IRS review. They seem to be poking around randomly rather than focusing on likely problem areas.
Their data requests cross serious lines according to those in government. While legitimate audits use targeted sampling, DOGE has pushed for sweeping access to the IRS's Integrated Data Retrieval System—a database holding sensitive information on nearly every American taxpayer. This motherlode contains private details of 150 million tax filers, far beyond what's needed for an efficiency review. Adding to concerns, DOGE has "provided no public information about how it plans to protect the sensitive data it collects." Without clear security protocols, their approach falls dangerously short of professional standards.
Failure to Engage Stakeholders Appropriately
Professional audits require meaningful engagement with everyone involved, following established protocols. DOGE's approach to the IRS lacks the transparency that legitimate audits demand. They've kept their objectives, methods, and findings largely under wraps. Without open communication about what they're looking for and how they're looking for it, their review falls short of audit standards. They've also failed to properly consult with key stakeholders. Chambers recommends that DOGE should "solicit and respond to feedback from key stakeholders," but notes they haven't done this adequately. The ability to "listen, learn, and be responsive" is fundamental to proper auditing—yet it's noticeably missing from DOGE's playbook.
Non-Compliance with Federal Auditing Standards
Federal audits follow strict government standards set by organizations like the Government Accountability Office (GAO) or agency inspectors general. These established frameworks ensure consistency, thoroughness, and reliability in oversight activities. DOGE's review completely sidesteps these established systems. The IRS already has a dedicated watchdog—the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA)—specifically designed to audit the agency. This specialized office possesses the expertise, authority, and institutional knowledge to properly evaluate IRS operations. By operating outside these official channels, DOGE further undermines its credibility as a legitimate audit and raises questions about why existing oversight mechanisms were bypassed.
Equally concerning is DOGE's questionable independence. True audits require unbiased assessment free from outside influence or predetermined conclusions. Professional auditors maintain strict separation from the entities they evaluate to ensure objectivity. Critics worry that DOGE's review may be guided more by political objectives than by neutral evaluation of efficiency—violating a core principle of proper auditing practice. Without this fundamental independence, the findings cannot be considered reliable or authoritative, regardless of what they ultimately reveal.
Conclusion
DOGE's activities investigating the IRS simply don't qualify as a legitimate audit. They're missing all the essential elements of proper government oversight. Their team lacks people with actual auditing credentials or experience. There's no clear, structured approach to their work - it feels more like they're fishing for issues rather than following a methodical process. Their data requests cross inappropriate boundaries, and they've completely failed to work collaboratively with relevant stakeholders. Most importantly, they're ignoring the established federal standards that guide proper auditing work.
Real government auditing demands rigor, consistent methodology, true independence, and genuine expertise. From what we can see, DOGE's examination of the IRS falls short on all these counts. It looks less like professional oversight and more like an unstructured investigation without proper foundations.
Thank you for reading The Poly, the #1 newsletter for prediction markets.
If you enjoyed this analysis, please help us by clicking the “♡ Like” button.
Risk warning and disclaimer: The Poly Newsletter is for information and entertainment purposes only and should not be regarded as investment advice. Betting on prediction markets is high risk and can result in significant financial loss. Professional bettors typically risk no more than 0.5-2% of their capital on any one trade. No warranty is made to the accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information provided. The information in the publication may become outdated and there is no obligation to update any such information. Never bet more than you can afford to lose.